Hello everyone!
today I will talk about changes that I want to do to my study programme.
In general I like my career and its curriculum, but I thinks there are many things that can to get better.
An example that is the curriculum of the basic cycle, because I think that is too long (two years), and, although it serves so that those who have not chosen a mention can do it, it is too much for those who already know to what area they want to dedicate or study, besides I think that the basic cycle is more oriented to the social anthropology and lack physical anthropology and archaeology courses.
On the other hand, I think most of classes are just theory and we need put into practice what we know, and in that sense, take advantage of the laboratories that exist in the university and the excursions to different places such as a museums, archaeological sites or ethnography works.
Respect to teachers and their teaching methodologies, I think that they have to be more didactic, because not all students accommodate standardized tests, and for some courses the academic load must be level or reduced, because in courses such as anthropology III or prehistory II, the amount of readings is too much and in some cases the requirement of the evaluations is very high (especially in prehistory II). but although for this situations exist the teacher survey and the qualitative evaluation of teachers, I think this evaluations many time are not considered and the situation does not change.
despite all of the above, the career is good, but there are things to improve.
i think that a cycle basic of some career have to address the different areas that compound the career and not just focus in one of them, on the other hand i think that in general in the social area is very important the practical activities because that activities can contribute more that a theoretical class
ResponderEliminar